New concepts grow your mind and the depth of conversations you can have learn, grow, act learn, grow, act
Home
Concepts
CV pages
WebLog
Learning
Change Journeys
Other People...
Essays
Sitemap


In Association with Amazon.co.uk
  Weblog Page
Dave aims to update this with something slightly interesting on an infrequent basis - so far this aim has been mostly fulfilled...

Got a suggestion?, email Dave | Weblog Archive | General Archive

04-MAR-05: Adverts

Adverts have appeared on arrod.

I know that most people aren't going to like them, and it doesn't really go with the ethos of the site, but the learning fund is going very overdrawn and frankly, I need the money.

For the last four months over 10 000 people a month have visited arrod, and so the five or so a day who click on a google sponsored ad look set to generate $200 a year...

So, sorry if you hate them...


04-MAR-04: Randomness

Creativity is about making connections. - so says WhatIf founder Dave Allen in his book on creativity Sticky Wisdom

In order to create new connections we need new input. It is very difficult to make new connections between things as they are. However if we can look at existing things in new ways or discover entirely new things then we can also forge new connections which are creative and innovative ideas.

Dave likes this idea a lot - and feels that this matches his aims expressed in his article on synergism and connections. To help with the randomness Dave has started a collection of quotes, ideas, anything that might help to spark off an original idea.

The randomness boxes will be popping up around the site, well, randomly and each time you refresh the page you'll get a different quote / idea / etc

 Randomness

I hope you enjoy them, suggestions are, as ever, gratefully received...


25-FEB-04: The third person

Last week Purple One of New Zealand mailed me to ask why Dave refers to himself in the third person. Never one to miss an opportunity for a blog topic I'm discussing it here.

At the most basic it's a kind of affectation in an attempt to make the site a bit more interesting - a house style if you like - like the three dots…

There's also a less flippant side in that I think it reflects the different personalities within me. You know how sometimes you observe yourself as if from the outside, well as the online Dave has written more and got feedback from people he has become slightly different from me. Part of this is living up to the implied expectation of the feedback and previous content. Dave is now (to a limited extent) public, thus doesn't define what he is himself, but is defined by his social context. This is obviously always true - you are a different person to everyone who knows you - and the way that you behave when around them reflects your understanding of their expectations.

I've also discovered that I am referring to myself in the third person in speech as well. I feel that this is because of the different states I can be in when performing different tasks. For example, I don't do the washing up, I think of how I could have handled a situation at work better, whilst Dave does the washing up.

By being able to present a consistent face to many people simultaneously (as one can on the web) I have realised that there are many Daves: the online Dave, the work Dave, the at home Dave, the out on the town Dave. However, I still feel contained within myself. I still feel as if I am internally consistent and an ongoing entity that develops and grows. If we observed Dave from the outside over time you and I would see that Dave is different things to different people, changes his accent depending on the class of his surroundings, affects habits to fit in, all the things that we do socially. Thus, Dave is not consistent at all as far as his identity is defined by his relationships with others.

I feel an article on identity brewing… Whilst it completes its fermentation, here is an amazing piece by Jorge Luis Borges. I first saw it in The Mind's I : Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, but got the text from here

"Borges and I" by Jorge Luis Borges
Original text is from Borges, Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings (New York: New Directions, 1964), pp.246-47.

The other one, the one called Borges, is the one things happen to. I walk through the streets of Buenos Aires and stop for a moment, perhaps mechanically now, to look at the arch of an entrance hall and the grillwork on the gate; I know of Borges from the mail and see his name on a list of professors or in a biographical dictionary. I like hourglasses, maps, eighteenth-century typography, the taste of coffee and the prose of Stevenson; he shares these preferences, but in a vain way that turns them into the attributes of an actor. It would be an exaggeration to say that ours is a hostile relationship; I live, let myself go on living, so that Borges may contrive his literature, and this literature justifies me. It is no effort for me to confess that he has achieved some valid pages, but those pages cannot save me, perhaps because what is good belongs to no one, not even to him, but rather to the language and to tradition. Besides, I am destined to perish, definitively, and only some instant of myself can survive in him. Little by little, I am giving over everything to him, though I am quite aware of his perverse custom of falsifying and magnifying things.

Spinoza knew that all things long to persist in their being; the stone eternally wants to be a stone and the tiger a tiger. I shall remain in Borges, not in myself (if it is true that I am someone), but I recognize myself less in his books than in many others or in the laborious strumming of a guitar. Years ago I tried to free myself from him and went from the mythologies of the suburbs to the games with time and infinity, but those games belong to Borges now and I shall have to imagine other things. Thus my life is a flight and I lose everything and everything belongs to oblivion, or to him.

I do not know which of us has written this page.


23-FEB-04: My mental toolbox moves house

Dave's just moved house (if you're one of the very wonderful friends who made it possible thank you!) and this morning was reading from the course book of his OU systems course. The course book mentioned the metaphor of a mental toolbox, and having spent the weekend dismantling and reassembling furniture I saw a connection…

Most of our furniture is self-assembly, and so comes with some semblance of it's own tools (like an allen key or a small spanner that hurts your hand). Now being a modern man in tune with my primitive roots I feel the need to keep a selection of tools in what I laughingly refer to as my toolbox. This keeps the hunter gatherer side of me happy that I am not completely emasculated by enjoying shopping.

When dismantling these various objects of furniture I was disappointed to find that my collection of tools did not always have the answer. In fact on numerous occasions I had to abandon the luxury of my cast-steel adjustable spanner to scrabble at the bottom of my toolbox for the pressed metal Ikea thing that had come with it in the first place.

The specific tool has the advantage of working perfectly as it is designed for the item. However, every item requires it's own tools and if there is cross compatibility it is only by luck. Thus, to cope with lots of furniture you'd have to carry loads of little tools that are each infrequently used.

In my own case, as I try and develop I feel that I need to move from lots of little mental tools that are each infrequently used to the mental equivalent of a proper set of spanners. The advantage is that they can deal with lots of circumstances, but they are expensive… The mental tools can only be paid for with experience, and the new set I want are very expensive!

This is my perpetual difficulty - what I want to do requires lots of generalist experience - I have lots for my age, but is this enough? Hence the hectic schedule and push for learning as I try to squeeze in my lifetime at many times the normal speed! FeedBack



In Association with Amazon.co.uk